Are You Rewarding Better Work or Just More AI Use?
As AI proficiency enters performance reviews and compensation decisions, leaders need to be certain they are rewarding the capabilities and outcomes their organizations actually value.
Articles
Thinking for
people doing the work.
Practical perspectives on leadership, organizational change and the consequences of changing work.
Featured insight ·
Your Managers Say They Support AI. Can Employees See It?
When leaders rely on manager activity that employees cannot observe, AI adoption may appear supported while uncertainty remains embedded in the work.
Read the featured insightExplore the collection
Find the thinking you need.
Start with a focus, or search for a question on your mind.
The Change Started Before Anyone Called It a Change
Some of the changes reshaping your organization may never have appeared on its transformation roadmap. That doesn't mean their consequences stop where they started.
The Change Was Communicated. Why Can't People Act on It?
When employees understand what is changing but everyday work remains unchanged, the problem may not be communication. It may be what the organization has made possible.
AI Can Change the Work Faster Than Decision Rights Catch Up
When AI changes tasks faster than authority, review, and accountability are clarified, organizations can end up with new work and old decision structures.
Conditions Before Change: Before You Ask People to Change, Examine What Must Be True
A leadership guide to diagnosing the organizational conditions around an intervention before deciding what to ask people to do.
Conditions Before Change: The Change Is Ready. The Organization May Not Be.
The practitioner essay that introduces Change Collaboration's Conditions Before Change concept and what OCM needs to see before asking people to carry a transition.
The silence between AI use and trusted adoption
Employees may be using AI without telling their employer, while others stay quiet about its effect on their jobs. Neither kind of silence is a reliable measure of readiness.
The second half of AI productivity is a change problem
Released capacity is not realized value. The harder test is whether people can move into redesigned work, exercise accountable judgment, and produce better outcomes after the efficiency gain.
When automation removes the work that teaches judgment
Organizations can gain efficiency and still weaken capability if AI takes away the routine experiences through which people learn context, exceptions, and sound judgment.
Resistance is evidence, not a character flaw
What looks like resistance may be a rational response to unresolved trade-offs, weak participation, competing demands, or a change that does not yet make sense in the work.
AI transformation is a work-redesign challenge, not a tool rollout
The organizations getting stuck on AI adoption are often solving for access while leaving roles, decisions, safeguards, and measures of value untouched.
From buy-in to ownership: what change leaders must visibly do
Sponsorship becomes credible when leaders make trade-offs, reinforce priorities, and remain present when the change becomes difficult.
The true cost of ignoring OCM appears after the project looks complete
Technical delivery can finish on time while value quietly leaks through workarounds, hesitation, weak decisions, and capability gaps.
Change capacity is not an empty square on the calendar
Organizations need a more honest view of cognitive, emotional, managerial, and operational load across overlapping change.
10 more to explore
See what's changing before it becomes your problem.
Every Wednesday, explore one consequential shift, what it means for executives, practitioners and consumers, and what to watch next.
Editorial standard
Published weekly.
Revised when the evidence moves.
- Directly relevant to organizational change practice
- Observation separated from interpretation
- Original sources linked wherever possible
- Practical implications made explicit
- Older pieces consolidated instead of endlessly duplicated